DO OSSO À PELE
UMA VISÃO CONTEMPORÂNEA DO ENVELHECIMENTO FACIAL E SUAS IMPLICAÇÕES CLÍNICAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22166581Palavras-chave:
Envelhecimento facial, Anatomia, Face, Tecido adiposo, Esqueleto facial, Pele, Rejuvenescimento facialResumo
Introdução: O envelhecimento facial é um processo progressivo, heterogêneo e tridimensional, determinado pela interação entre esqueleto facial, compartimentos adiposos, sistema ligamentar, musculatura mimética e pele. A compreensão contemporânea substituiu a interpretação exclusivamente gravitacional por modelos anatômicos integrados, com implicações diretas no planejamento de procedimentos cirúrgicos e minimamente invasivos. Objetivo: Revisar, de forma narrativa, os principais mecanismos anatômicos e fisiopatológicos do envelhecimento facial, preservando uma abordagem estratificada dos planos profundos aos superficiais e discutindo suas implicações clínicas e terapêuticas na interface entre HOF, CEOF e CTBMF. Métodos: Foram analisados estudos clássicos e contemporâneos sobre envelhecimento facial, anatomia em camadas, remodelamento ósseo, compartimentalização adiposa, sistemas de retenção, musculatura mimética, biomecânica facial, envelhecimento cutâneo e modalidades terapêuticas aplicáveis à estética orofacial. A síntese foi organizada por plano anatômico e integrada em um modelo clínico de raciocínio. Discussão: As evidências indicam que o envelhecimento facial não resulta de falha isolada da pele ou de simples descida gravitacional, mas da interação entre remodelamento esquelético, deflação e redistribuição de gordura, sistemas de retenção, musculatura e matriz dérmica. A organização por camadas permite correlacionar alterações anatômicas com modalidades terapêuticas empregadas na HOF, na CEOF e na CTBMF. Conclusão: O envelhecimento facial deve ser compreendido como fenômeno multicamadas, interdependente e individualizado. Este modelo favorece planejamento terapêutico estratificado, no qual procedimentos minimamente invasivos, cirúrgicos e estruturais são indicados conforme o plano anatômico predominante de alteração.
Referências
1. Gonzalez-Ulloa M, Flores ES. Senility of the face: basic study to understand its causes and effects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36(2):239-246.
2. Cotofana S, Fratila AAM, Schenck TL, Redka-Swoboda W, Zilinsky I, Pavicic T. The anatomy of the aging face: a review. Facial Plast Surg. 2016;32(3):253-260. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1582234.
3. Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, Lorenc ZP, Vleggaar D, Werschler WP, et al. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(Suppl 1):11S-24S. doi:10.1177/1090820X10378696.
4. Freytag L, Alfertshofer MG, Frank K, Moellhoff N, Helm S, Redaelli A, et al. Understanding facial aging through facial biomechanics: a clinically applicable guide for improved outcomes. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2022;30(2):125-133. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2022.01.001.
5. Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(1):11-16.
6. Mendelson BC. Surgery of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system: principles of release, vectors, and fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(6):1545-1552; discussion 1553-1555.
7. Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(5):1367-1376. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000279348.09156.c3.
8. Pessa JE. An algorithm of facial aging: verification of Lambros’s theory by three-dimensional stereolithography, with reference to the pathogenesis of midfacial aging, scleral show, and the lateral suborbital trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(2):479-488.
9. Pessa JE, Zadoo VP, Yuan C, Ayedelotte JD, Cuellar FJ, Cochran CS, et al. Concertina effect and facial aging: nonlinear aspects of youthfulness and skeletal remodeling, and why, perhaps, infants have jowls. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(2):635-644.
10. Pessa JE, Zadoo VP, Mutimer KL, Haffner C, Yuan C, DeWitt AI, et al. Relative maxillary retrusion as a natural consequence of aging: combining skeletal and soft-tissue changes into an integrated model of midfacial aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(1):205-212.
11. Pessa JE, Desvigne LD, Lambros VS, Nimerick J, Sugunan B, Zadoo VP. Changes in ocular globe-to-orbital rim position with age: implications for aesthetic blepharoplasty of the lower eyelids. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23(5):337-342.
12. Kahn DM, Shaw RB Jr. Aging of the bony orbit: a three-dimensional computed tomographic study. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28(3):258-264.
13. Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Yaremchuk MJ, Girotto JA, Kahn DM, et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):374-383. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95b2d.
14. Shaw RB Jr, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Kahn DM, Girotto JA, Langstein HN. Aging of the mandible and its aesthetic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(1):332-342. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a685.
15. Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(4):753-760. doi:10.1007/s00266-012-9904-3.
16. Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2219-2227. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000265403.66886.54.
17. Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1804-1809. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816c3c1a.
18. Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE, Ristow B. The youthful cheek and the deep medial fat compartment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(6):2107-2112. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817123c6.
19. Gierloff M, Stohring C, Buder T, Gassling V, Acil Y, Wiltfang J. Aging changes of the midfacial fat compartments: a computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(1):263-273. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182362b96.
20. Cotofana S, Lachman N. Anatomy of the facial fat compartments and their relevance in aesthetic surgery. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2019;17(4):399-413. doi:10.1111/ddg.13737.
21. Rohrich RJ, Avashia YJ, Savetsky IL. Prediction of facial aging using the facial fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(1S-2):38S-42S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007624.
22. Galanin I, Nicu C, Tower JI. Facial fat fitness: a new paradigm to understand facial aging and aesthetics. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(1):151-163. doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01933-6.
23. Le Louarn C, Buthiau D, Buis J. Structural aging: the facial recurve concept. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(3):213-218. doi:10.1007/s00266-006-0024-9.
24. Coleman SR, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(1 Suppl):S4-S9.
25. Donofrio LM. Fat distribution: a morphologic study of the aging face. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(12):1107-1112.
26. Rohrich RJ, Ghavami A, Lemmon JA, Brown SA. The individualized component face lift: developing a systematic approach to facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(3):1050-1063. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819c91b0.
27. Fisher GJ, Varani J, Voorhees JJ. Looking older: fibroblast collapse and therapeutic implications. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(5):666-672. doi:10.1001/archderm.144.5.666.
28. Quan T, Fisher GJ. Role of age-associated alterations of the dermal extracellular matrix microenvironment in human skin aging. Gerontology. 2015;61(5):427-434.
29. Rabe JH, Mamelak AJ, McElgunn PJS, Morison WL, Sauder DN. Photoaging: mechanisms and repair. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(1):1-19. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.05.010.
30. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Korting HC. The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;19(6):296-302. doi:10.1159/000094670.
31. Beaini TL, Cappellette Jr M, Melani RFH. Facial pattern analysis: critic review and collection of facial proportions in a Brazilian sample using cone-beam computed tomography. Biosci J. 2017;33(5):1389-1400.
32. Sundaram H, Signorini M, Liew S, de Almeida ART, Wu Y, Braz AV, et al. Global aesthetics consensus: botulinum toxin type A-evidence-based review, emerging concepts, and consensus recommendations for aesthetic use, including updates on complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):518e-529e. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000475758.63709.23.
33. Sundaram H, Liew S, Signorini M, Braz AV, Fagien S, Swift A, et al. Global aesthetics consensus: hyaluronic acid fillers and botulinum toxin type A-recommendations for combined treatment and optimizing outcomes in diverse patient populations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(5):1410-1423. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002119.
34. van Loghem J, Yutskovskaya YA, Werschler WP. Calcium hydroxylapatite: over a decade of clinical experience. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015;8(1):38-49.
35. de Almeida AT, Figueredo V, da Cunha ALG, Casabona G, Faria JRC, Alves EV, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of hyperdiluted calcium hydroxyapatite as a face and body biostimulatory agent. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(3):e2160. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002160.
36. Ao YJ, Yi Y, Wu GH. Application of PLLA (Poly-L-Lactic acid) for rejuvenation and reproduction of facial cutaneous tissue in aesthetics: a review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(11):e37506. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000037506.
37. Cure E, Parra Hernandez LA, Martinez Amado A, Rodriguez Cabrales JS, Garces E, Dicker V, et al. Optimizing collagen biostimulator choice in LATAM: expert consensus on patient selection, ethnic skin phenotypes, and accessibility. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025;24:e70564. doi:10.1111/jocd.70564.
38. Soleymani T, Lanoue J, Rahman Z. A practical approach to chemical peels: a review of fundamentals and step-by-step algorithmic protocol for treatment. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018;11(8):21-28.
39. Morris MX, Gebhardt S, Tingen JN, Dorante MI, Pandya S. Laser resurfacing versus chemical peels: a review of current trends and technological advances in nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. J Aesthetic Med. 2025;1:5. doi:10.3390/jaestheticmed1010005.
40. Petrov A. Efficiency of carbon dioxide fractional laser in skin resurfacing. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2016;4(2):271-276. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2016.062.
41. Foppiani JA, Fanning JE, Beltran K, Raska O, Hernandez Alvarez A, Taritsa I, et al. Microneedling for facial rejuvenation: a systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;49(17):4949-4960. doi:10.1007/s00266-025-04972-z.
42. Neri JSV, Souza DAS, Dantas JBL, Lima AAM, Silva AM. Aplicação do ultrassom microfocado no rejuvenescimento facial: uma revisão da literatura. Int J Sci Dent. 2023;30(60):137-146. doi:10.22409/ijosd.v1i60.54172.
43. Li X, Xie G, Yang Z, Li S, Liao X, Lu J, et al. Evaluating the long-term effects of microfocused ultrasound on facial tightening using quantitative instruments: efficacy and safety. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026;50:692-706. doi:10.1007/s00266-025-05205-z.
44. Kumar N, Suh DH, Lee SJ, Ryu HJ. Radiofrequency-based treatments for facial rejuvenation: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, and patient-centered outcomes. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025;7:ojaf159. doi:10.1093/asjof/ojaf159.
45. Germani M, Munoz-Lora VRM, Carnevali ACN, Geroldo AM, Teixeira FF, Giro G. Is more always better? A randomized comparative clinical trial about the impact of polydioxanone threads quantity for facial lifting. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025;7:ojaf002. doi:10.1093/asjof/ojaf002.
46. Cohen SR, Womack H. Injectable tissue replacement and regeneration: anatomic fat grafting to restore decayed facial tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(8):e2293. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002293.
47. Sadati K, Motakef S. Triple-C SMAS plication facelift for natural facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(12):e2575. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002575.
48. Gimenez AR, Rohrich R, Borab Z, Fisher S, Fagien S, Rohrich RJ. Safety and complications in lower eyelid blepharoplasty: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025;13:e7102. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007102.
49. Khoury S, Almubarak Z, Khan H, Boldt G, Villemure-Poliquin N, Nichols AC. The deep plane versus SMAS facelift: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;49:5895-5903. doi:10.1007/s00266-025-05118-x.
50. Denadai R, Chou PY, Su YY, Lo CC, Lin HH, Ho CT, et al. Facial appearance and psychosocial features in orthognathic surgery: a FACE-Q- and 3D facial image-based comparative study of patient-, clinician-, and lay-observer-reported outcomes. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):909. doi:10.3390/jcm8060909.
51. Kim YJ, Kim MY, Jha N, Jung MH, Kwon YD, Shin HG, et al. Treatment outcome and long-term stability of orthognathic surgery for facial asymmetry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Orthod. 2024;54(2):89-107. doi:10.4041/kjod23.194.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Categorias
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Nathalia Gusmão Prado Schnorr, Ana Paula da Cunha Barbosa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os artigos publicados na RBHOF são licenciados sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), que permite o uso, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam devidamente creditados.
